The Use of Free Web Analytics Solutions (The Chicken and the Egg)

July 24th, 2007 by Lars


Eric T. Peterson and Zori Bayriamova today released the report “The Problem with Free Analytics, Risks and Recommendations for Companies Planning to
Standardize on a Free Web Analytics Solution”. They’ve found in their research that users of free tools are generally:

  • more likely to work with web analytics on an ad hoc basis
  • less likely to have integrated web analytics into their decision making process
  • more likely to lack the resources they need in order to be successful (42% of respondents reported zero FTEs dedicated to web analytics)
  • newer to the field (58 % of respondents have less than 2 years of experience)
  • working for small businesses (52% of respondents work for companies with less than 50 employees)

Their recommendation is that companies that use free tools should spend the money saved on the tool on recruiting the right talents.

Disclaimer: The data is only based on users in the U.S.

To access this research, please visit http://www.webanalyticsdemystified.com/research/

My question when it comes to free web analytics solutions and those who use them is this:

Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Do you lack resources because you have selected a free tool or do you select a free tool because you lack resources? I would be inclined to say it must be the latter. It could, however, also be an informed decision. Maybe the active choice to live up to the 10/90 rule (or the 10/20/70 rule for that matter)? But what if you spent zero dollars on the tool? Well, spend all your money on people and process instead!

Posted in Web Analytics |




Leave a Comment




Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay some comments. There is no need to resubmit your comment. We use spam protection to filter out comment spam.


Join us in North America and Europe to talk about web analytics and Internet marketing!






Tags

3D live stats acquisitions alberta anthony garcia applied insights argentina asia aurelie pols australia avinash kaushik belarus bob page books brazil british columbia canada chatstat china clickdensity clicktale clicktracks clientstep conference conversation conversion multiplier coremetrics cpm crazyegg czech republic danny sullivan denmark dennis mortensen email marketing emetrics eric t. peterson ethics europe exacttarget finland foviance free free tools gatineau germany getting smarter google google analytics grokdotcom helsinki hiring hurol inan ian tickle ideal observer imc indextools india Inspiration instadia internet marketing conference interview japan jim novo jobs john marshall korea KPI latvia lunametrics marketing marketing lab maxymiser memetrics microsoft mobile multivariate nedstat neil mason neil morgan new york new zealand nordic oceania offermatica oliver schiffers omniture optimost OX2 persuasion phil kemelor podcast poland predictions predictive analytics quebec reviews robbin steif robotreplay russia satama scotland search seattle sem sem & seo SEM & SEO seth godin singapore site catalyst sitespect south america stephane hamel steve jackson stockholm survey sweden taguchinow tapefailure targeting testing thailand ukraine unica usa usability vancouver vendor selection vicky brock video visistat visitorville visual sciences visualization waw web analyst web analytics web analytics association web analytics demystified webcontrol websidestory website optimizer websites webtrends wunderloop yahoo










Feedback Form
Close
Powered by ShareThis