Dagens Media recently wrote about three Swedish bloggers and quoted their number of unique visitors (browsers). The blogs are kissie.blogg.se (unknown) , blondinbella.se (20,000 per day), and kenzas.se (22,000 per week).
Aftonbladet published a similar article.
Advertisers like to hear how many unique visitors websites get. As you may have noticed before, I am a big fan of performance marketing and not much of a fan of CPM or fixed-rate advertising.
Advertisers should always look at how unique visitors are measured (first-party cookies, third-party cookies, persistent cookies, session cookies, daily counts, weekly counts, etc.). You should also check whether non-human visitors, like crawlers, are excluded from visitor counts.
The bloggers mentioned use measurement tools from the following suppliers:
Kissie: Tailsweep
Blondinbella: Nielsen//NetRatings
Kenzas: Nielsen//NetRatings, Tailsweep, and Blogtoplist
For unique visitor counts to be as accurate as possible, persistent first-party cookies are necessary. It’s also recommended to measure as short periods of time as possible since longer periods of time increase the risk that cookie deletion skews the count.
When WebAnalysts.Info checked the aforementioned websites, unique visitor counts were not as accurate as possible. Should advertisers care? Depends on how they pay.
CPM and fixed rates: yes (actions are not necessary for website owners to get paid)
CPA and CPC: not as much (actions are necessary for website owners to get paid)
While I’m at it, I think that lists such as KIAindex that list number of visitors, visits, and page views are overrated. They are fun to look at, but you shouldn’t base how much you’re willing to pay for ad space based on them. You can use lists to find websites were you can potentially get the most volume in terms of orders or leads, but size isn’t all that matters. Audience and context should not be forgotten. Nor should the long tail. Focus on performance marketing no matter where you advertise.
ShareThis